Saturday, February 4, 2012

"Size Does Matter, Mr Lansley" - Drop the Bill!

The NHS Federation has produced a list of health organisations "For" and  "Against" the Tory led government's health and social care reforms bill, I reproduce it below.




Does David Cameron, Andrew Lansley and Nick Clegg still think they know better than virtually every health care professional organisation in the country about what is best for the NHS?

Why is this Tory led government insisting on forcing through their ill thought out dangerous legislation against every medical professional in the country, despite promising us 1) "there will be no top down reorganisation of the NHS (David Cameron in opposition) and 2) that they would listen to what we have to say about issues that effect us and our lives? The NHS could not affect each and every one of us more, so why are this government refusing to listen to us?

Hands Off Our NHS
 Mr Cameron, Mr Lansley and Mr Clegg.
We simply will not allow you to destroy and privatise our NHS, even the Royal College of GPs have asked you to withdraw the bill, and according to Lansley, GPs are central to the working of the entire bill, I fail to see how you can possibly carry on with this bill without them on board.

Gps have said that they are seriously concerned, other organisations have called it a  "bloated and opaque piece of legislation, whose goals could have been achieved by other more effective means".

How much more opposition to this bill does this hideous, out of touch incompetent lying g Tory government need before they stop this dangerous act of utter destruction on our NHS?


Sign the petition.



Before it's too late and the government have snatched away the NHS from us.


"No political party would survive that tried to destroy the NHS".  Aneurin Bevan





Friday, February 3, 2012

Why Ed Miliband Beats David Miliband Hands Down in Leadership Qualities.

Ed Miliband Leader of the Opposition and man for the Future

Recently David Miliband wrote an article for the News Statesman, in it he set out his own feelings about the way his brother Ed should be leading the Labour party.

I am a great believer in fate and believe that everything happens for a reason for example, Labour did not win the 1992 election (against the odds) because the time wasn't right, their time came along in 1997 and the Labour party were then able to give this country 11 years of  recession free financial stability, they saved the NHS, education was pulled up by its boot straps and people's quality of life improved and unemployment fell to  just over one million at one point, before the global financial crash happened.

The contrast between Ed Miliband and and brother David Miliband is now coming to the fore, the differences could not be more pronounced. David appears to believe very much in "business as usual" kind of politics, leaving big business and the banks to run their affairs very much in the way they always have. This may have worked during his own tenure as  Foreign Secretary, but times have changed and they have changed drastically and to ignore what has happened in the world as a result of bankers irresponsible lending and gambling with our money is to just set us up for a future crash. David appears to be stuck in the past, while brother Ed has the nous, courage and ability to see the bigger picture, to understand that the entire world's attitude to banking, bankers and big business needs to change, he also has the political courage to voice his opinions, knowing fully well how personally attacked he will be, including attacks from his own brother!

The banks must never again be permitted to grab us by the goolies and hold us there while they do what they want and get away with it, these people must be made to realise they are not above the law.
If the banks and big businesses are not checked and regulated and brought into line now, true we will probably recover economically at some point, but how long will it be before we are facing yet another global crash? To fail to act now is to fail to learn the lessons of recent history, just like we failed to learn the lessons from the great depression and crash of the 1930's.

David Miliband appears to have missed this entirely, while his brother Ed seems on the ball and able to grasp it, understand it and be strong enough to bring the debate up to the top of the agenda. Ed Miliband said this is his speech at the 2011 Labour party conference, he was lambasted by bankers, business and the prime minister, however, Ed Miliband is now being proved right.

Ed Miliband is vitally necessary, not only to modern politics, not only to the Labour party, but he is vitally necessary to the financial well being and financial future of this country. He is able to think in terms of the future and what is needed and what changes need to be made, while David Miliband is stuck in the past with yesterday's politicians, like Tony Blair and David Cameron, the world is moving on, we need to be there and be part of it, if we are not then we will be left behind. David Cameron is also of the same ilk as David Miliband, they have no vision for the future and they are too afraid of polls, ratings, banks and business to be of much use to problems that face the ordinary person in Britain today.

Not only is the contrast between Ed and his bother now clearly evident, it is also stark between him and David Cameron. Where Cameron and Miliband senior have peaked and their light is now fading, Ed Miliband's light is gradually growing brighter. His honesty, integrity, political nous and basic decency is beginning to shine through, but not only this, his intellectual ability to be able to lead this country and make the tough decisions to enable us to move on is also coming through.

Ed Miliband is far more statesmanlike than David Cameron, and he has also outgrown his brother David, if David cannot change then he needs to stop his moaning, accept that the leadership was a contest that his brother was perfectly entitled to enter and win, accept that he lost and move on, he needs to show a little of the dignity and restraint his younger brother has shown.

Ed Miliband is the future and he is what this country needs in a prime minister for these times.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

David Cameron's Own GP hates Tory NHS Reforms


Last week in PMQs the Prime Minister, David Cameron bizarrely  tried to defend his ailing NHS reforms bill by quoting that a single GP in Doncaster liked his plans. I wonder what Cameron has to say about the GP in Witney the PM's Oxfordshire constituency who has said that he hates Cameron's plans and that "things will fail and hospitals will close?"

What makes the Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, the Prime Minister, David Cameron and the Deputy PM, Nick Clegg all think that they are right and virtually the entire medical profession and many patients organisations are all wrong?

The PM, his deputy and the health Secretary have no medical training whatsoever, in fact none of them have ever held a proper job before entering politics.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Cameron's Hypocrisy...Hypocrisy...Hypocrisy!



It could be said that nearly everything in every day life is about timing, which is why I believe police detectives when they maintain "there is no such thing as a coincidence". With that in mind the pong that is starting to emanate from Downing Street over former RBS boss "Sir" [no longer] Fred Goodwin being stripped of his knighthood is growing stronger and stronger.

Isn't it all just a teensy weensy bit coincidental that Fred Goodwin was stripped of his knighthood right at this particular time, when David Cameron and his Tory government were on the ropes over their mate (another RBS boss) Stephen Hester receiving almost a million pounds bonus? Am I just a wee bit cynical to suggest that the fact that Fred Goodwin was awarded his knighthood by the former Labour government and this was used in order to try and deflect bad press away from Cameron and Downing Street?  Cameron didn't just phone the queen up yesterday and ask her to do this, David Cameron and the Tories had pre arranged for him to be stripped of his title, a committee had met and already made the decision and the Conservative PM and his director of communications, former BBC editor Craig Oliver were saving it up for use when they needed a big story to divert attention away from the David Cameron. The whole thing stinks of party political pokery!


  • Goodwin's knighthood was awarded by Labour 
  • Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband, forced Cameron on the back-foot over RBS boss Stephen Hester's  bonus
  • Fred Goodwin is close to SNP Leader Alex Salmond
  • Cameron is under attack for caving in, in Europe
After David Cameron and George Osborne completely misjudged the mood of the British people and had publicly defended Stephen Hester receiving his bonus and then failed to pin the blame on Labour, they needed a quick political fix and unfortunately for Fred Goodwin he was it!

Don't get me wrong, I believe that Mr Goodwin should have been stripped of his knighthood, but then again I suppose I should say that I believe he should never have been awarded it in the first place! I remain to be convinced about the need for knighthoods and peerages at all - ever. I simply fail to see, or understand the logic why any banker, or any boss of a multinational company should be awarded knighthoods and peerages just for doing their jobs, isn't it enough that they are awarded telephone number salaries, receive golden hellos, golden goodbyes and are awarded platinum pensions and are bunged nice big bonuses of a few million quid in between all that lot? Fred Goodwin was awarded a knighthood for "services to banking" no mention of that fact that his particular "services" to banking involved having to be bailed out with £49 billion of taxpayers money  and that his services to banking nearly collapsed the whole world's economies,  however, it was not just down to him alone, it was him and all his banker mates, so why pick on just one single person? And isn't this [pardon the pun ] the $6 million question!

In the US 50 bankers have been prosecuted for their part in the banking collapse, eg toxic loans and the miss-selling of sub-prime mortgages, yet precisely NONE have been prosecuted in the UK - why?

Why just pick on Fred Goodwin, or was he just a handy scapegoat to be used because the government had placed themselves in trouble? There are plenty of other bankers and leaders of multinational companies that have got knighthoods and peerages and what about those Lords that have criminal convictions and have even served prison sentences yet get to keep their peerages? People Like Tory Lord Jeffrey Archer, Lord Taylor and Lord Hannifield. Here are just a few of Tory peers and Knights and MPs who have fallen foul of the law.

Sir Paul Ruddock - David Cameron awarded a knighthood to Paul Ruddock, who made millions  short selling from the collapse of Northern Rock Sir Paul Ruddick  has given over £500,000 to the Tories. George Osborne has since refused to outlaw short selling, even though it has been outlawed in other EU countries because it can destabilise whole economies. 

Gerald Ronson - the property tycoon and Tory donor and time served convicted criminal was awarded a CBE by David Cameron.



Doug Ellis, James Wates and James Lupton received a knighthood and two CBEs respectively, for charitable and philanthropic work. They have given £370,000 to the Tory Party between them. 


Tory Lord Ashcroft - Tory donor who has donated millions to the Tory party, but has also avoided paying over £127 million in tax to the UK treasury.

 Lord Hanningfield? The 70-year-old former Tory frontbencher falsely claimed almost £14,000 for overnight accommodation in London, when on most nights he was returning home to his bungalow, less than 50 miles away from the capital

Tory peer, Lord Taylor, a Birmingham-born former barrister who became the first black Conservative peer when he took his seat in the House of Lords in 1996, is set to remain a member of the Upper House despite being jailed.


Sir Anthony Bamford  - a Tory party donor.  In 2010, one minute he was being measured up for his ermine robes to enter the Lords and the next he had decided not to accept. probably had something to do with the tax authorities - routinely consulted by the house of Lords appointments Committee - had declined to support his nomination for a life peerage, because of what they'd been confidentially told by the tax authorities.

Tory MP Alan Duncan - Resigned as a parliamentary aide in January 1994 following accusations that he made £50,000 from an illicit purchasing deal on a council house. He was said to have loaned a neighbour £50.000 to buyh his council house under the right to buy scheme and then purchased the house off of him. He is now the shadow secretary of state for business, enterprise and regulatory reform.

Derek Conway  former Tory MP  was suspended from the House of Commons and had the Tory whip withdrawn after it emerged that he paid his son parliamentary allowances while he was still a student at Newcastle University. 

Giles Chichester  Leader of the party in the European Parliament was forced to resign his post after admitting breaking the rules on expenses to the tune of almost £500,000.

Neil Hamilton, former Tory MP for Tatton and former corporate affairs minister's career ended in disgrace for his part in the "cash for questions" affair of the 1990s. He faced accusations he had accepted cash from Harrods' owner Mohamed Al Fayed in exchange for asking parliamentary questions. He resigned alongside parliamentary aides Graham Riddick, David Tredinnick and junior Northern Ireland minister Tim Smith, who were all implicated in the scandal between July and 


Jonathan William Patrick Aitken  is a former Tory MP for 24 years, and a former Conservative government Cabinet minister. He was convicted of perjury in 1999 and received an 18-month prison sentence, of which he served seven months, His famous quote when charged with his offences was; 


 "If it falls to me to start a fight to cut out the cancer of bent and twisted journalism in our country with the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of British fair play, so be it. I am ready for the fight. The fight against falsehood and those who peddle it. My fight begins today. Thank you and good afternoon."


Lord Jeffrey Archer served 4.5 years for perjury and perverting the course of justice, he has served his time, but he should not be allowed to remain a Lord.

Dame Shirley Porter - The former Tory leader of Westminster council was ordered to pay a surcharge of £27 million for her part in the "council home sales for votes" scandal of the 1980s. The law lords said attempts to gain political support by selling council homes in marginal wards to potential Tory voters was "a deliberate, blatant and dishonest misuse of public power"

Although successive ministers have proposed reforms so errant peers could be expelled, there is currently no way of removing them other than passing an Act of Parliament
The ball is in David Cameron's court, he could if he wanted do something about this, but he probably wont as we all know that the majority of people who would be stripped of their titles would probably belong to the Tory party.
The knights and peers from the business world are hedge funders, City bankers, venture capitalists and heads of multinational companies and many donate huge sums to the Tory party - this is why David Cameron will never do anything about this.

The question also needs to be asked; "would David Cameron have had Fred Goodwin's knighthood annulled if it had been awarded by a Conservative government"? This is the Pm who awarded a knighthood to Paul Ruddick a hedge funder whom made millions out of the collapse of Northern Rock!

 One of the most striking anomalies about the Tory party scandals is that very few of their MPs were ever taken to court, while Labour MPs were prosecuted for far less. I  lose no sleep over MPs going to jail for what they did, however, justice should be fair and be seen to be fair and when it comes to the Tory party - it just isn't!

If public life is to  be cleaned up then there needs to be greater parity coming from the heart of the Conservative led government and Cameron's habit of awarding honours to large Tory party donors does nothing for the reputation of politics. 

Cameron is tough when it is easy for him to be tough but inherently weak at all other times.

This from the Prime Minister who promised us he was going to clean up politics and make it transparent - yeah right.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Oh the "Success" of "Osborne and Cameronomics"



According to a report in today's Telegraph (I know the Telegraph is dumbing down these days but bear with me)

Corporation tax should be halved to boost business and revive Britain’s economic growth, according to a think tank.
The Centre for Policy Studies is urging David Cameron to cut corporation tax to as little as 10 per cent because it is the “only source of a viable economic recovery”.

Because of course this really worked for Ireland - didn't it?

During the past years Ireland cut corporation tax to the bone with the specific aim to poach industry and multinational companies away from the UK. Ireland almost bankrupted it itself in the process as their tax receipts from these companies plummeted and had a dangerous damaging effect on the Irish economy. Remember here that George Osborne has described Ireland as our friends and neighbours when he bailed  Ireland out with an £11 billion pound loan at British taxpayers expense. Personally I would not describe someone as a good neighbour who poached all our business forcing our people out of work and then bend over backwards to obtain loans at preferable rates for them, especially as Ireland still has not learned its lesson and has not raised its level of corporation tax. If I were in Osborne's position one of the provisos of helping out Ireland, our "good" neighbour out of the hole it dug for itself would have been a stipulation that they raised their corporation tax to match the UK's so giving an even playing field again. However, Osborne failed to do this but hang on wasn't George Osborne the same person who when in opposition travelled to Ireland to "look, listen and learn from the Irish economy" in order to introduce many of their policies in the UK when he became chancellor? All I can say is thank the Lord that Osborne was not our chancellor at this time or we would now be in exactly the same position as Ireland - Oops sorry I forgot we are, George Osborne took an economy with 1.1% growth in Q1 in May 2010 and turned that growth in to negative contraction inside 19 months and he now has the UK looking down the double barrels of a shotgun with a double dip recession looming, we need just one more quarter negative growth and off we go and many top economists are forecasting that, while others are describing the UK as already in a "technical recession". Oh how I love these City folk, a technical recession, a light recession, one that will not last, pity these people who have all been backing Osborne's insane austerity measures to the hilt (despite the fact that lowly people such as us forecast this recession as soon as Osborne announced his plans and pointed out the glaringly obvious) don't loose their jobs.

And the moral of this story is that in Ireland all their services have been cut to the bone and corporation tax is still rock bottom producing hardly anything for the Irish economy and to top that the Irish people have had their national minimum wage cut forcing them to subsidise the multinational companies that their government is already heavily subsidising with low corporation tax. The Irish economy is in recession, austerity measures have not worked, they have been cut, cut and cut now they cannot cut back any more and austerity has failed, what now? More "Osboromics" more Cameronomics"?

Still Osborne doesn't need to worry about a double dip recession, he is still avoiding paying £1.6 million in tax to his own Treasury, he is still allowing the likes of Bob Diamond from Barclays to avoid paying tax and he is still writing off the £6 BILLION owed in tax by Vodafone and Stephen Hester of RBS may have been forced to hand back his million quid bonus for doing sod all, but don't  feel sorry for the "poor man" he sill has his mansion sitting in 350 acres of prime land, he still has his Swiss chalet and his luxurious flat in Knightsbridge and Cameron and Osborne are still blaming the weather, the royal wedding, the eurozone and the Labour party for their own appalling cock-ups, so everything is fine in Tory land, it;s us poor bastards that are carry the can for the rich, powerful and affluent 1% (as per usual)!

By the way don't fall for Cameorn's shifting the blame for Stephen Hester's bonus onto the Labour party, the buck stops squarely at Cameron, Osborne and Clegg's door and here is exactly why;

Hester's contract didn't guarantee his bonus it the bank made a profit. It is the banks remuneration committee that issued instruction for the bonus to be paid, so the previous Labour government had nothing to do with the bonus. The bonus needed to be ratified at the AGM and the government (us taxpayers) as the major shareholder with 82% could have vetoed that bonus at that point or earlier and instead of doing this Cameron and Osborne signed it off. Hester and the Tories only gave in to pressure because the Labour party tabled a vote in the House of Commons and all this would have become common knowledge.

Who said that lies, deceit and hypocrisy wasn't alive and kicking in today's Conservative party?

Sunday, January 29, 2012

The Truth About Andrew Lansley, The Lobbyist and the NHS



Over the Next few months, the Tories will attempt to rubber-stamp the process that will change the NHS for good. Helping the Conservative government to push through their health and social care NHS reform bill is a man called Bill Morgan who is currently employed as a Special Adviser on health policy by the health secretary Andrew Lansley at the Department of Health. (DoH)

This is not the first time that Bill Morgan and Andrew Lansley have worked together, in 2005 and 2007, Bill Morgan was a Tory adviser working on a wide range of Conservative health policies and also assisting Lansley who was then the shadow health secretary to prepare for parliamentary questions.

So who exactly is Bill Morgan and why has he been parachuted into such a position of power?

“Mr Morgan is a former lobbyist who joined Andrew Lansley’s office at the Department of Health in July 2010 has been director for the health arm of Mandate Communications, a public relations company which has since merged with MHP communications.
Head of Mandate's health practice, Mike Birtwistle blogged on Mr Morgan's appointment:
"Personally, I can think of no one better to advise the incoming Secretary of State. Bill has a sharp policy mind, allied to a clear instinct for politics and he is fiercely loyal to his bosses. These talents will be needed as Andrew Lansley seeks to steer the NHS through choppy financial waters whilst also embarking on a major programme of structural and system reform. Civil servants will have to get used to Bill scrutinising their figures and recommendations, but I have no doubt that the end result will be better as a result of it.
Clearly we will be sad to see Bill move on - he has been a great colleague and he will continue to be a good friend. Health Mandate's clients and our team of consultants have obviously benefitted from Bill's insights into the direction of Conservative policy. Now, as he prepares to take up a new role, we look forward to continuing to be at the heart of the major policy debates which will shape the future of the NHS."

It's clear that these reforms were being built long before the Tories came to power in 2010, which makes a complete liar out of David Cameron when in opposition he promised NHS staff and the public that there would be "no more top down reorganisation in the NHS", when he made that promise he already knew that he and Lansley were going to oversee the biggest reforms in the NHS entire 60 year history, Mr Cameron is guilty of deliberately misleading NHS staff and the general public!
MHP’s clients include Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods and Tesco Stores. All three companies have signed up to the Conservative-led government's Public Health Responsibility Deal which replaced the Food Standards Agency. It seems an odd thing to do as the last time the Tories were in power they were dogged with food and health crisis for a decade, remember salmonella in eggs and BSE?  The FSA was performing well, yet the government abolished it and deregulated the food industry, giving companies more freedom and power.
The health secretary Andrew Lansley, who was responsible for the Responsibility Deal, also has past links to organisations representing big companies.
Lansley was a paid director of marketing agency Profero until December 2009. During this time Lansley was also Shadow Secretary of State for Health.
Current clients of Profero include Marks and Spencers and, in its Australian branch, Pizza Hut.
Drinks manufacturer Diageo, producers of Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff and Guinness among others, was added to the company’s client list in February 2011. Diageo provided the health select committee with written evidence in favour of the Public Health Responsibility Deal.

Was the abolition of the FSA the result of the lobbying power of Bill Morgan? It also helped that Morgan knew the health secretary personally, the very man who became responsible for overseeing the old Food Standards Agency and the FSA was one of the first casualties of the incoming Tory-led government in July 2010!
The 'Responsibility Deal'   is little more than a favour to the government's friends in big business. Is it really feasible to expect big business, which makes billions every year by marketing sugary, fatty and unhealthy foods to willingly limit its own profiteering?
In October 2010 the Department of Health records shows that Mr Morgan attended a breakfast meeting with representatives from his old company, Health Mandate.
A Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘The breakfast meeting hosted by Mandate was between Mr Morgan and a range of healthcare stakeholders, including several charities, to update them on the government’s NHS plans. He has undertaken similar engagements hosted by other organisations.’
“Mr Morgan’s departmental hospitality records show meetings with other companies and organisations, however, Mandate are the only public relations company logged.
“… Earlier this year leaked emails between Bill Morgan and private healthcare company appeared to show that, Tribal provided the DoH with a list of pro-privatisation GPs to help convince ministers and the public of the need for further NHS privatisation.

Bill Morgan's Dealings with The Private Sector

Pro-reform GPs are a key front in the public relations offensive behind UK health minister Lansley's health and social care bill, which is currently going through parliament. Internal emails obtained by SpinWatch revealed that in December 2010 Morgan was supplied with a list of friendly GPs by Kingsley Manning of leading healthcare consultancy firm Tribal Group. Tribal confirmed it was in discussions with some of the GPs on the list of future lucrative contracts. Manning's email to Morgan said:
“Further to our conversation, please find attached a list of GPs you may want to contact with respect to the launch of Consortia Pathfinders; we haven’t briefed them so somebody would need to talk to them before they were exposed to the press.”
Manning initially claimed that Tribal had “no discussions” with Lansley or his department about helping the government sell its bill. He admitted having dealings with Morgan but denied supplying tame GPs for the government’s spin campaign.
“We certainly wouldn’t do that, we are not in the business of acting as a voice piece for the government. There is significant merit in these reforms. But it is not Tribal’s policy to promote [them] on behalf of the government,” he said.
However, when told his email to Morgan had been released under freedom of information legislation, Manning claimed Morgan had requested the list, which he admitted may contain the names of GP pathfinder consortia with whom Tribal is in commercial discussions. Manning also conceded that the government’s campaign had so far failed to persuade most patients, NHS staff and suppliers of the case for reform. (Powerhouse)

The Tribal Group is a consulting business, which describes itself as "focused on improving the delivery of public services."
It operates in the UK "in partnership with a wide range of organisations across the public sector, including government departments and agencies; the NHS, strategic health authorities, primary care trusts and health providers; schools, colleges and universities; and local authorities." It also operates in 65 countries around the world.
In August 2010, Tribal's shares shot up after talk of a takeover came to light. In the longer term, Tribal was tipped to be one of the winners from government cuts, with the public sector turning to the company for advice on how to reduce costs. It sold its health and government business to rivals Capita for £15.87m in April 2011

"Denationalisation of health care"

In 2010 Tribal Newchurch saw a major opportunity in providing infrastructure for new general practice (GP) consortiums. These consortia are a key proposal of the UK Coalition government's 2010 Health White Paper. The plans would see GPs being handed a £80 billion annual commissioning budget, a policy that has been labelled the "most revolutionary" change in the NHS since it was created.There are fears that the private sector will be invited to take over if consortia slip up.
In a press release outlining Tribal's response to the government's proposals and their implications,Tribal Newchurch's director of business development, Kingsley Manning, said:
"This white paper could amount to the denationalisation of health care services in England... It could result in the biggest transfer of employment out of the public sector since the significant reforms seen in 1980s. As NHS trusts become foundation trusts, this will see the transfer of billions of tax-payers’ assets to employee-controlled businesses... The old certainties are gone: the NHS cannot be protected from economic reality any longer."
However, in an interview published in August 2010, Manning struck a more cautious note commenting on whether the private sector could take over commissioning from GPs entirely: 'It's difficult to see how legislation could ever devolve responsibility for NHS services fully to a private company."
But Tribal - like UnitedHealth UK, Humana, Bupa and Aetna UK - are clearly positioning themselves to help GPs commission services: Manning again: "If consortia are going to fly, they have to use the best available technology. We provide services GPs will struggle to replicate." How much Tribal and others can expect to earn from the NHS from helping GPs is still in question: "There is a vital discussion over how much (GP consortia's) management allowance will be," says Mr Manning. "If the management fee is too small it may not be financially viable for companies to provide support."

 "They Are All In It Together"
Tribal has funded the influential think tank Policy Exchange, which was co-founded by Francis Maude MP, who is now Cabinet Office minister, and Nick Boles, who is now a Tory MP for Grantham and worked with Maude to ready Cameron’s policies for government. 
Tribal funded a report by the  Policy Exchange in January 2010 called 'Controlling Public Spending: The NHS in a period of tight funding'. ( The "Policy Exchange" is David Cameron's "favourite" think tank!)

Keeping it in the family
This is not the first time that Lansley has found himself in controversial waters, he has previously been exposed as accepting a £22,000 donation to his constituency office from the Tory donor and hedge fund director John Nash, who is also chairman of Care UK, another private healthcare company which stands to make millions from lucrative NHS contracts under the new reforms. John Nash and his wife have also donated £100,000 to the Tory party coffers.
Andrew Lansley's wife Sally runs a public affairs business which boasts about advising drug and food companies. Sally Low, the managing director of Low Associates, denied being a lobbyist, saying she provided clients with “strategic policy” advice. At a business conference less than two years ago, however, Miss Low gave a lecture on improving lobbying skills, where she advised people to “establish positive relationships with decision-makers before you need their help”.
“Pursue your lobbying internally until you hit a wall,” she added.
Declaring these "activities" in the member's register does exonerate them from being a conflict of interests, which there clearly is with this health secretary. David Cameron said he was going to clean up politics, in fact, he has turned the water from being slightly muddy to outright murky. This government is looking more corrupt with each passing day.

Privatising the NHS



Shortly before Andrew Lansley launched his Health and Social Care NHS reforms bill, Tribal an outsourcing company which has £150 million worth of NHS contracts secretly supplied the Tory government with a list of supposedly "independent" GPs in order to help the Government sell their controversial reform bill to the patients and staff.

Tribal supplied a list of "friendly" GPs to Bill Morgan  who is Andrew Lansley's special adviser. Bill Morgan is a former lobbyist for private health companies and Tribal has confirmed that it has held discussions with some GPs that appear on the list about future lucrative contracts.

These "pro-reform" GPs are a key part in Lansley's plans to sell his health and social care reforms to medical staff and the public. I would like to know if any of the GPs on the list that Tribal supplied Andrew Lansley with are also signatories of the "pro-reforms" letter written by the 56 GPs that was published in the Daily Telegraph?

This following quote and a link to an eleven page dossier written by Tribal appeared on the NHS Alliance website

"Tribal – ‘Liberating the NHS’ – The next turn in the cork screw? An analysis of the Coalition Government’s proposals for health.Tribal’s people are public service specialists with unrivalled expertise, primarily in the education, health and government sectors.They understand the complex challenges faced by public service leaders - and have the skills to come up with the right solutions to address them."

Just how independent is the NHS Alliance?

Access to the ordinary Tribal website can be gained but to gain access to www.tribalgroup.com:80 website a user name and a password is required, why such cloak and dagger stuff? What has the NHS Alliance and Tribal have to hide?



Kingsley Manning, business development director for health at Tribal said this in a press release:

"This white paper could amount to the denationalisation of healthcare services in England and is the most important redirection of the NHS in more than a generation, going further than any Secretary of State has gone before."A cornerstone of the white paper's argument for such radical change is the NHS’s comparatively poor outcomes."The old certainties are gone: the NHS cannot be protected from economic reality any longer."

Kingsley Manning wrote to Bill Morgan (Lansley's adviser) in December 2011 attaching a list of GPs sympathetic to the reforms stating that Tribal hadn't be briefed them and suggested that somebody would need to contact them before they were exposed to the press.  In April 2011 this  panicked letter from Conservative Mayor Dr Jonathan Munday was leaked to the press.

Tribal believes that the success or failure of Lansley's reforms rest with gaining the support GPs, which is probably why they are going the extra mile to discover which GPs are for the bill and going to great lengths to see that these GPs are heard and published in the Tory supporting press.

Tribal say of *denationalisation*

Denationalisation: this white paper could result in the biggest transfer of employment out of the public sector since the significant reforms seen in 1980s. As NHS trusts become foundation trusts, this will see the transfer of billions of tax-payers’ assets to employee-controlled businesses.

Not hard to see exactly why Tribal is so keen for these reforms to take place is it? 

Despite the Tories claims to the contrary it would appear that David Cameron, Andrew Lansley and George Osborne have secretly been planning the break-up and privatisation of the NHS for years and as they now have the full support of Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats one can only assume that they too are in favour of full scale privatisation of the NHS.
While in opposition David Cameron famously promised NHS staff there would be no more top-down reorganisation of the NHS, describing its recent history as "like a bowl of alphabetti spaghetti". His commitment was reiterated in the coalition agreement and was widely welcomed by health service staff. At the latest relaunch of his reorganisation plans, he claimed that he was "taking out a huge amount of bureaucracy" from the NHS. Yet after he became PM he has launched the biggest "reorganisation" of the NHS in its entire history and more, he knew he was going to do this when he was blatantly telling us he would not, so he lied and deliberately misled the British people. It is inconceivable that these plans were just hastily drawn up in a couple of weeks, in fact, at the relaunch of the white paper David Cameron got carried away and let it slip that he and Andrew Lansley had been working on these reforms for years! Far from reducing bureaucracy, these Cameron's and Lansley's reforms will introduce FIVE more layers of bureaucracy at the very least and Lansley has accused the BMA of being "politically poisoned"!

Kingsley Manning has publicly denied that Tribal had held "discussions" with Lansley's department about helping the government to sell its bill, he later admitted to having dealings with Morgan but denied supplying "tame GPs" for the government's spin campaign. However, when told his email to Morgan had been released under freedom of information legislation, Manning claimed the special adviser had requested the list, which he admitted may contain the names of GP pathfinder consortia with whom Tribal is in commercial discussions.  The Government have refused  to publish the list of GPs obtained from tribal.

In view of the seriousness of this whole issue and that it involves the entire functioning and position of the NHS, I believe the government not only should publish the names of these GPs but they have a duty to do so. After all it was David Cameron, George Osborne and Nick Clegg that made much of the "transparency of government", it is a bout time they stop their obfuscation and practised what they preached.

Do any of the doctors from the NHS Alliance who signed the letter in the Telegraph supporting Lansley's reforms appear on the list of GPs that were given to Andrew Lansley by the outsourcing company Tribal?

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

The Liberal Democrats - The Biggest Political Losers of the Year!



At one point in recent political history whether you agreed with them or not you could safely assume that the Liberal Democrats were ardent pro-Europeans, pro free education, pro-immigration and strong supporters of Human Rights, this used to be the ethos of what the Liberal Democrat party was actually built on.


The failure of the Lib Dems to capitalise on their sudden "popularity" at the 2010 general election and the resulting shock at actually losing of 5 seats instead of gaining some would normally have prompted the resignation of their leader (Nick Clegg) and had it not been that the Conservatives were looking for MPs to give them a majority government in parliament, one suspects that this would have been the course of events, so it could be said that David Cameron and George Osborne actually saved Nick Clegg's job and prolonged political career!

The Liberal Democrats have always been the chameleon of British politics often being 100% for something in one constituency, while representing the exact polar opposite in another in order to capitalise on as many votes as possible and by and large they always seemed to have got away with this anomaly, probably because not that many people took them seriously. Over the years the Lib Dems became quite adept at harnessing the "protest vote" from both the Labour and the Conservative parties, however, something went very badly wrong in the 2010 general election and after the poll  one may have expected the Liberal Democrats to hold an urgent "post mortem" on what went wrong but astonishingly they failed to address the serious loss of a sizeable chunk of their core vote! Now bizarrely, in some of their constituencies they still believe they can protest against the government  and government cuts that they themselves are part of.  The Liberal Democrats seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that if it were not for the support of the Liberal Democrat ministers and junior ministers in the Conservative government and cabinet, then Cameron and Osborne would not be able to implement its right wing ideological policies, the very policies which are having such a disastrous effect on peoples lives and the lives of their families. So we have the incredulous disingenuous situation where some Liberal Democrat (and Conservative) cabinet members and government members are on one hand enabling the government to make these cuts by actually voting with the government and then these very same ministers are returning to their constituents and joining protests against the cuts that they themselves have voted for! It is so bizarre that you couldn't make it up! However not only is it bizarre, it is also deceitful and these ministers are guilty of deliberately misleading and manipulating their constituents into believing one thing while practising the exact opposite. No wonder the public are losing faith in the British political system!

The Liberal Democrats are not just in denial, they all appear to be suffering from collective delusions, illusions of grandeur and "selective amnesia". Why would anyone trust them with their vote ever again?

We the voters are entitled to ask the Liberal Democrats whose side they are actually on?


On the side of students? - Once upon a time the Lib Dems had managed to win over the majority of the student vote, but that has fallen by the wayside as Nick Clegg, Vince Cable, Simon Hughes, David Laws, Chris Huhne and virtually all 57 Liberal Democrats reneged on their promise to university students where they pledged to "scrap tuition fees" and voted instead with the Tory government to treble tuition fees.  After making a great deal of noise in public proclaiming that many of them were not going to vote with the government, vote with the government is exactly what they did. A couple abstained which means they may just as well voted with the government - vote abstention is just a cowardly cop-out.

On the side of our children's education? No, the Liberal Democrats have given their full backing to Tory Education Secretary, Michael Gove and now "Pupils are being denied careers advice at a time of record youth unemployment, schools are scrapping projects to help the neediest children catch up on their reading, and teachers of music, art and sport are losing their jobs, a Guardian investigation into the impact of cuts on education reveals.
The education secretary, Michael Gove, claimed last year that the government was "protecting the frontline", and the coalition says schools and colleges will manage to save £1bn between now and 2014 just by trimming back-office functions.
However, research by the Guardian indicates that shrinking budgets are already significantly reducing the range and quality of education on offer to all pupils across England, from toddlers to teenagers. Even schools in deprived neighbourhoods are having to make swingeing cuts, despite receiving the pupil premium, which this year has equated to an extra £488 for each child who receives free school meals." The Liberal Democrats made much of the "pupil premium" but it is not new money and has amounted to nothing. 
On the side of the NHS? - Once again the Liberal Democrats made a big noise about how they were not going to help the government get their Health and Social Care Reforms bill through parliament, they were going to discuss this at their party conference and vote on it, but they never did, they cowardly copped out and when it came right down to the wire in parliament the Liberal Democrats actually voted with the Conservative government to destroy, break-up and privatise our NHS, instead of voting with the labour opposition to try and help save the NHS. Further, the Liberal Democrat Peers in the Lords including Baroness Shirley Williams had a chance to vote against the bill and made much noise about doing so, but then voted with the government, leaving the Labour peers and some cross party peers alone to try and oppose and block the bill's passage, because of David Cameron's planted cronies in the Lords, the Labour peers and cross party peers were outnumbered and they failed to block the bill's passage. Just one single Lib Dem peer voted with the Labour peers in order to try and save the NHS from certain Tory destruction.

On the side of public sector workers? - Nurses, midwives, doctors, paramedics, teachers, social workers, police, fire fighters, soldiers, backroom staff, cleaners, dinner ladies, lolly-pop ladies/men, refuse collectors, road sweepers etc. etc. etc. all of whom work extremely hard in and for our communities, without them and their dedication to duty and the public we would cease to function as a country, yet the Liberal Democrats have backed this government to slash these people's pensions, pensions they pay into and work very hard for, often doing the jobs others simply could not do, or do not wish to do. The government want public sector workers to work longer, pay more in and get less out, completely reneging on a previous pensions settlement. They are also backing the Tory government to make a million public sector workers redundant at a huge cost to our communities and hospitals etc.

On the side of the workers? - No of course not, the Liberal Democrats backed the chancellor in giving corporate tax cuts to the rich corporations. It's a Tory myth that reduced corporation tax leads to high growth and wage rises, if it did, then why did Ireland who had the the lowest corporation in tax in Europe end up in the terrible situation they are now in? (The same country that Osborne said he visited to look and learn from the brave way the Irish were running their economy - good job he wasn't in power then or we would now be in the same boat as Ireland!) Despite Osborne forcing this country to help bail out the Irish economy, he still refuses to ask the Irish to raise their 12.5% corporation tax, a tax set so low it not only greatly harmed the Irish economy leading to its virtual bankruptcy, it harmed the British economy as companies left this country to set up in Ireland!  The truth is that low corporation tax leads to hedge fund betting, gambling on the stock markets, higher CEO pay, stagnating wages and Corporation managers that are in a position to manipulate governments and influence policy without ever having to stand for election. It also allows multi-national companies like Vodafone and banks like Barclays to avoid paying their correct taxation in the country they make their vast wealth in. The Liberal Democrats now back the Tories in all of this. it is not these huge companies that create jobs in the economy in the UK, it is the many thousands of small companies that do this, companies that are getting a raw deal from this government and this Tory chancellor, companies that are being heavily pursued for their taxes while the Tory chancellor George Osborne allows his mate in Vodafone to get away without paying the £6 billion he owes this country in tax!

On the side of local communities? - No, the Liberal Democrats have voted with the government to slash local spending, forcing the closure of Sure Start Centres; home care for the elderly; Care for the disabled; Care Homes for elderly and the disabled which also often provide vital respite care to give carers a much needed break;  closing of Libraries, Leisure Centres; children's playgrounds; vital local bus services etc. yet as mentioned above Lib Dem minister have actually helped the government to implement this and then returned to their constituencies and instead of admitting that they are helping to the Tories to do all of this, they bizarrely campaign against themselves and their own cuts!

On the side of the elderly? - No, the Liberal Democrats helped the Tory government to cut up to £100 off of the Winter Fuel Allowance paid to pensioners, at a time when gas has risen at least 19% and electricity by at least 14%, forcing pensioners to choose between eating a hot meal or heating their homes. This is despite a pledge made by David Cameron to end fuel poverty by 2016. they have also backed the Tory government to withdraw free TV licences for the elderly and also to withdraw the elderly's free bus passes.

On the side of workers rights and our human rights? - No, the liberal democrats back the Tories to curb our human rights and our rights at work. By stopping legal aid, making it really difficult and expensive placing it beyond the reach of most working people to take a bullying and errant employer to a tribunal and making it easier for employers to sack their staff for little or no good reasons.

On the side of Britain's poorest? - No, Tax cuts for low and middle-income families in April will be dwarfed by hidden reductions in tax credits, according to a study for The Independent newspaper.

The analysis found that the £1bn of tax cuts in April will be outweighed by reductions of more than £2.5bn in the complex tax-credit scheme. 
The Government's flagship policy of raising income-tax thresholds has been trumpeted by the Liberal Democrats as their main achievement since the Coalition was formed last year – and a major boost for the low-paid.
But the Resolution Foundation think tank, which undertook the study, questions the fairness of the changes...
But basic-rate taxpayers will gain by a "very small" £41-a-year after the April rise in tax thresholds, according to the think tank – which describes it as "a relatively inefficient way of targeting the low to middle-income group because those on higher incomes also benefit". Most higher-rate taxpayers will also gain £41 a year!

On the side of  British industry, British Exports and British Jobs in Europe? - No, they backed Cameron's deliberate deceit of what actually happened regarding the veto in Brussels and helped him to deliberately con and mislead the British public. The result being this country is now side-lined in Europe and even business leaders like Richard Branson are condemning Cameron's rash and crazy attitude. Over 40% of our trade and 3 million jobs depend on the EU and the Liberal Democrats backed Cameron's shenanigans in playing to the xenophobic right wing of the Tory party. Cameron never had to use our veto in Europe, because at that point there was nothing to sign and nothing to veto, now our all important European trading partners treat us with contempt and we are now (thanks to Cameron) the laughing stock of Europe.

When the Liberal Democrats decided to join forces with the Conservatives to help form the Coalition Government, they told us that they were doing so to help keep the Tories in line and to curb some of the Tories excesses, in fact far from doing that, the Liberal Democrats have backed the Tories to the hilt in virtually everything, even over Europe. they have made a lot of noise about opposing the Tories but when "push comes to shove" they are right there with the Conservative government backing them and their right wing ideological policies to the hilt.

Liberal Democrats should feel particularly let down by MPs like Simon Hughes, and Bob Russell, who seemed to be holding out against what Clegg was doing to the Liberal Democrat party, when in the end these MPs have just weakly capitulated and became an ugly caricature of what they once were and of what values they once held, they have too have been bought out by the Prime Minister, David Cameron and the Tory party, how this must sickening the stomachs of Liberal Democrats supporters and grass roots activists and it would if they were being honest and it would if they have avoided being bought out by the Conservatives, however, here too at this level the great Tory "buy out" of the Liberal Democrat party is in evidence. The true people who know this is wrong have long gone, some have defected to labour to try and continue to fight for those they represent and others have just given up politics altogether. This was never so apparent in the local elections of May 2011 when the Liberal Democrats lost over half of their councils as their vote collapsed.

The Liberal Democrats cannot possibly be called "democrats" any longer, not by any stretch of the imagination, they cannot even be called "Liberal Democrats" any longer, they are now more "blue" than some of the moderate Tories and can only be described as "true blue Tories" and it is time they stopped their deceit and their masquerading  and admitted that they are Conservatives.

 It looks like the collapse in support for the Liberal Democrats is not going to be won back and come the general election they could very well be left with just a dozen or so MPs, yet still they do not seem to realise the danger they are in, and the government they are part of and fully back is now almost 20 months old, come summer we will be mid term and with the economy tanking and some analysts saying we are already in a double dip recession, time has all but run out and next year and the year after look to be the gloomiest for the economy. Liberal Democrat voters will quite rightly ask why their party has a supported a government that was hell bent on implementing austerity measures that the Liberal Democrats once themselves said would harm the economy. The Liberal Democrats once agreed with Labour that to implement such austere measures was unnecessary and would prove fatal for the economy and then once they got into power they changed their minds did a 180 degree turn and backed Osborne and Cameron's austerity measures which have done exactly what labour said they would do and what the Lib Dems also once said they would do and has harmed the British economy, reversed growth and caused soaring unemployment and destroyed consumer confidence.

And at the end of the day who are the Liberal  Democrats and what do they actually stand for? They have traded in all their beliefs for a brief synapse of power, they have not only betrayed their supporters, they have also betrayed the people of this country.

So the biggest losers of the political year must be awarded to the "Liberal Democrats" who have deliberately thrown away years of tradition, and more recently many years of hard slog in their constituencies building up their core vote, and to harness their ability to capture the "protest vote" and to grow their party and appeal to more moderate progressives - in favour of short term power and feeling of being important in Westminster. "Well done"!